CVE-2025-31619

Remediation/Mitigation Strategy: CVE-2025-31619 - SQL Injection in Actionwear Products Sync

This document outlines the vulnerability, severity, potential exploits, and recommended remediation steps for CVE-2025-31619, an SQL Injection vulnerability affecting Actionwear Products Sync versions up to and including 2.3.3.

1. Vulnerability Description:

  • Vulnerability: SQL Injection
  • Component: Actionwear Products Sync
  • Affected Versions: All versions up to and including 2.3.3
  • Description: The Actionwear Products Sync application suffers from an SQL Injection vulnerability. This means an attacker can inject malicious SQL code into database queries, potentially allowing them to:
    • Read sensitive data from the database (user credentials, product information, etc.).
    • Modify or delete data in the database.
    • Potentially execute arbitrary code on the database server (depending on database configuration and permissions).
  • CWE: CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’)

2. Severity:

  • CVSS Score: 8.5 (High)
  • Vector String: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (Based on CVSS v3.1 score, assumes Network access, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, high confidentiality impact, high integrity impact, no availability impact.)
  • Rationale: The high CVSS score reflects the potential for complete compromise of the database, including unauthorized data access and modification. The lack of a requirement for user interaction or privileges increases the risk of exploitation.

3. Known Exploits (Hypothetical, as no specific exploit is detailed in the provided information):

Since no specific exploit is detailed, we need to consider potential attack vectors based on typical SQL Injection vulnerabilities. Here are some possibilities:

  • Exploit Vector 1: Parameter Manipulation in API Requests: An attacker could manipulate parameters in an API request used by the Actionwear Products Sync. For example, if the application uses a product ID to query the database:

    • Vulnerable Code Example (Illustrative): $product_id = $_GET[‘product_id’]; $query = “SELECT * FROM products WHERE id = " . $product_id; // Execute the query

    • Exploit Example: An attacker could send a request like: example.com/productsync/api?product_id=1 OR 1=1;--

      • OR 1=1 will always be true, potentially returning all rows.
      • ;-- comments out the rest of the query, preventing syntax errors.
  • Exploit Vector 2: User Input Fields (if any exist): If the application has any input fields (e.g., for searching, filtering, or adding products), these could be injection points.

    • Vulnerable Code Example (Illustrative): $search_term = $_POST[‘search’]; $query = “SELECT * FROM products WHERE name LIKE ‘%” . $search_term . “%’”; // Execute the query

    • Exploit Example: An attacker could enter a search term like: %'; DROP TABLE products;--

      • This could potentially drop the entire products table if the database user has sufficient privileges.

4. Remediation/Mitigation Strategy:

The primary goal is to prevent malicious SQL code from being interpreted and executed by the database. Here’s a comprehensive strategy:

  • A. Immediate Action: Input Validation and Sanitization

    • Identify Vulnerable Code: Thoroughly audit the Actionwear Products Sync code to identify all locations where user-supplied data is used in database queries. This includes parameters in API requests, form inputs, and any other source of external data.
    • Input Validation: Implement strict input validation. Verify that input data conforms to expected data types, formats, and ranges. Use whitelisting to allow only known good characters. For example:
      • If a field expects an integer, ensure that the input is indeed an integer.
      • If a field expects a product name, validate that it only contains allowed characters (letters, numbers, spaces, etc.).
    • Input Sanitization (Escaping): Use proper escaping techniques provided by the database library to neutralize special characters in user input before constructing SQL queries.
      • Prepared Statements (Parameterized Queries): This is the strongly recommended approach. Prepared statements separate the SQL code from the data, preventing SQL injection. The database driver handles the escaping and quoting of parameters. Example (using PDO in PHP):

                $product_id = $_GET['product_id'];
        

        $stmt = $pdo->prepare(“SELECT * FROM products WHERE id = :id”); $stmt->bindParam(’:id’, $product_id, PDO::PARAM_INT); // Explicitly type the parameter as an integer

        $stmt->execute(); $results = $stmt->fetchAll(); * Escaping Functions: If prepared statements are not feasible in certain areas, use database-specific escaping functions (e.g., mysqli_real_escape_string in PHP for MySQL) to escape user input before including it in the SQL query. Note: Escaping functions must be used correctly and consistently for all user inputs used in queries. Using prepared statements is far more secure.

  • B. Long-Term Strategy: Code Review and Secure Development Practices

    • Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews of the Actionwear Products Sync application to identify and address any remaining SQL Injection vulnerabilities or other security flaws.
    • Secure Development Training: Provide developers with training on secure coding practices, including SQL Injection prevention techniques.
    • Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST): Integrate SAST tools into the development pipeline to automatically detect potential SQL Injection vulnerabilities during the development process.
    • Dynamic Analysis Security Testing (DAST): Use DAST tools to test the running application for SQL Injection vulnerabilities by simulating real-world attacks.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the application to identify and address any new vulnerabilities.
  • C. Database Security Hardening:

    • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that the database user used by the Actionwear Products Sync application has only the minimum necessary privileges to perform its functions. Avoid using a database user with full administrative privileges.
    • Database Configuration: Review and harden the database server configuration to minimize the risk of SQL Injection attacks. Disable unnecessary features and services. Keep the database server software up-to-date with the latest security patches.
    • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Consider deploying a WAF in front of the application to filter out malicious requests, including those attempting to exploit SQL Injection vulnerabilities.
  • D. Monitoring and Logging:

    • Implement Comprehensive Logging: Log all database queries and user input to aid in identifying and investigating potential SQL Injection attacks.
    • Monitor for Suspicious Activity: Monitor application logs for suspicious activity, such as unusual database queries or error messages related to SQL syntax.
    • Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Consider deploying an IDS to detect and alert on potential SQL Injection attacks.
  • E. Patching:

    • Release a Security Patch: Develop and release a security patch for Actionwear Products Sync that addresses the SQL Injection vulnerability. This patch should include the necessary input validation and sanitization measures to prevent future attacks.
    • Notify Users: Notify all users of Actionwear Products Sync about the security vulnerability and the availability of the security patch. Encourage users to upgrade to the patched version as soon as possible.

5. Rollback Plan:

Before applying any remediation steps, it’s essential to have a rollback plan in case of unforeseen issues.

  • Backup: Create a full backup of the application code, database, and configuration files.
  • Testing: Thoroughly test the remediation steps in a non-production environment before deploying them to production.
  • Rollback Procedure: Document a clear rollback procedure in case the remediation steps cause issues. This may involve restoring the application from the backup.

6. Communication:

  • Keep stakeholders (users, management, IT staff) informed of the vulnerability, the remediation plan, and the progress of the remediation efforts.
  • Be transparent about the risks and potential impact of the vulnerability.

Important Considerations:

  • This strategy is based on general principles and may need to be adapted to the specific implementation of the Actionwear Products Sync application.
  • It is crucial to consult with security experts to ensure that the remediation steps are effective and do not introduce any new vulnerabilities.
  • Regular security assessments and penetration testing are essential to identify and address any remaining vulnerabilities.

Assigner

Date

  • Published Date: 2025-04-01 20:58:15
  • Updated Date: 2025-04-02 14:58:08

More Details

CVE-2025-31619