CVE-2025-31564

Remediation/Mitigation Strategy for CVE-2025-31564 - SQL Injection in Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant

This document outlines the remediation and mitigation strategy for the SQL Injection vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-31564, affecting Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One versions up to and including 2.1.7.

1. Vulnerability Description:

• Vulnerability: Blind SQL Injection
• Description: The Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One plugin is vulnerable to SQL Injection. This means an attacker can inject malicious SQL code into queries executed by the application. In a blind SQL injection, the attacker does not receive direct feedback from the database, making exploitation more challenging but still possible. They must infer the results through observing application behavior, such as timing delays or the presence/absence of content.
• Affected Product: Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One
• Affected Versions: All versions up to and including 2.1.7

2. Severity Assessment:

• CVSS Score: 8.5 (High)
• CVSS Vector: (Based on provided data, we can infer parts of it, but the full vector is missing. A typical SQL Injection vector might look something like: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, but this is just an example as the exact vector depends on the attack vector and impact of the particular vulnerability instance.)
• Severity: High
• Rationale: SQL Injection vulnerabilities allow attackers to potentially bypass authentication, read sensitive data, modify data, and even execute arbitrary commands on the database server. Even blind SQL injection, while requiring more skill and time, can lead to severe data breaches or complete system compromise. A CVSS score of 8.5 reflects the high potential for impact.

3. Known Exploit (Based on description):

• Exploitability: Based on the vulnerability description and CVSS data, we can infer that the vulnerability requires no user interaction and can be exploited over the network. Since this is blind SQL injection, the attacker needs to carefully craft SQL payloads and analyze the response for timing delays or different behavior to infer results.
• Attack Vector: Presumably network-based, allowing remote exploitation.
• Exploit Example: (Hypothetical - specifics depend on the vulnerable code)
  • The attacker identifies a vulnerable parameter in a web request made by the plugin (e.g., a search query, a user ID).
  • They inject SQL code, such as '; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'; -- , into the parameter. This example introduces a 5-second delay to the server.
  • By observing whether the server takes 5 seconds longer to respond, the attacker can infer whether their SQL injection was successful.
  • The attacker iteratively refines their SQL injection payloads to extract data or manipulate the database. For example, they might use boolean logic within the injected SQL to extract data one bit at a time.
• Potential Impact:
  • Data Breach: Sensitive data, including user credentials, personal information, and financial records, could be compromised.
  • Data Modification: An attacker could modify data in the database, leading to incorrect information or system instability.
  • Account Takeover: Attackers can potentially steal user credentials and gain unauthorized access to accounts.
  • Denial of Service: Malicious SQL queries can overload the database server, leading to a denial of service.
  • Remote Code Execution: In some cases (though less common with blind SQL injection), attackers might be able to execute arbitrary code on the database server.

4. Remediation Strategy:

• Immediate Action:

  • Upgrade: The primary and most effective remediation is to upgrade the Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One plugin to a version higher than 2.1.7, where this vulnerability is patched. Check the plugin developer’s website or the plugin repository for updates. This should be the highest priority.

• Short-Term Mitigation (Until Upgrade is Possible):

  • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF with updated rulesets to detect and block SQL injection attempts. Configure the WAF to specifically look for SQL injection patterns in requests targeting the plugin’s endpoints. Ensure the WAF is in blocking mode (not just monitoring). Example rules to look for:
    • SQL keywords (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP, UNION, etc.)
    • SQL comments (–, /* */)
    • SQL injection operators (=, <, >, ‘, “, ;)
    • Encoded SQL characters (%20, %27, etc.)
    • Suspicious timing-based patterns (e.g., WAITFOR DELAY)
  • Input Validation: Implement strict input validation on all user-supplied input that is used in SQL queries. Sanitize and validate data on the server-side before it is used in any database interaction. This includes:
    • Whitelisting: Define allowed character sets and input formats. Reject any input that does not conform to the whitelist.
    • Encoding: Encode special characters (e.g., ‘, “, <, >, &) to prevent them from being interpreted as SQL commands.
    • Length Limits: Enforce maximum lengths for input fields to prevent buffer overflows and other attacks.
  • Database Permissions: Review and restrict database user permissions. Ensure that the database user used by the plugin has the least necessary privileges to perform its functions. Avoid using a database user with full administrative access.
  • Monitor Logs: Monitor application and database logs for suspicious activity, such as SQL injection attempts or unusual database queries. Set up alerts to notify administrators of potential attacks. Specifically look for error messages related to database queries.

• Long-Term Remediation:

  • Secure Coding Practices: Adopt secure coding practices to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities in future development. This includes:
    • Parameterized Queries (Prepared Statements): Use parameterized queries or prepared statements in your database interactions. This prevents SQL injection by separating the SQL code from the data. This is the most effective long-term solution. The database driver will handle escaping special characters properly.
    • Data Sanitization: Implement robust data sanitization techniques to cleanse user-supplied input before it is used in SQL queries. This should be used in addition to parameterized queries, not as a replacement.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the plugin’s code to identify and fix potential vulnerabilities.
    • Penetration Testing: Perform penetration testing to simulate real-world attacks and identify weaknesses in the plugin’s security.
  • Code Review: Implement mandatory code review processes where multiple developers review code for security vulnerabilities before it is deployed.
  • Security Training: Provide security training to developers to educate them about SQL injection vulnerabilities and secure coding practices.

5. Communication:

• Inform Users: If you are the plugin developer, notify users of the vulnerability and provide clear instructions on how to upgrade to a patched version.
• Transparency: Be transparent about the vulnerability and the steps you are taking to address it.
• Patch Availability: Make the patch readily available and easy to install.

6. Testing and Validation:

• Post-Upgrade Testing: After upgrading the plugin, thoroughly test the application to ensure that the vulnerability has been fixed and that no new issues have been introduced.
• Regression Testing: Implement automated regression tests to ensure that future changes do not reintroduce the vulnerability.
• Vulnerability Scanning: Use automated vulnerability scanners to periodically scan the application for potential vulnerabilities.

7. Reporting:

• If you discover a vulnerability, report it responsibly to the plugin developer or the appropriate security organizations. If you discovered it yourself, document your findings thoroughly.

Important Considerations:

• The effectiveness of mitigation strategies depends on the specific implementation and configuration.
• Regularly update your security tools and practices to stay ahead of evolving threats.
• Consult with security experts for guidance on implementing appropriate security measures.
• This is a blind SQL injection vulnerability, which is more difficult to exploit but still dangerous. It requires a skilled attacker, but the potential impact is high.

This remediation/mitigation strategy provides a comprehensive approach to addressing the SQL Injection vulnerability in the Ai Auto Tool Content Writing Assistant (Gemini Writer, ChatGPT ) All in One plugin. By following these steps, you can significantly reduce the risk of exploitation and protect your data and systems.

Assigner

• Patchstack [email protected]

Date

• Published Date: 2025-04-01 20:58:13
• Updated Date: 2025-04-02 14:58:08

More Details

CVE-2025-31564